Is Coding with LLMs Cheaper Than a Junior Dev? The Actual Numbers for 2025

You drag some rectangles. Fire off an LLM prompt in Cursor. Suddenly your prompt report says you just burned $1.47 in three minutes. Is this—seriously—cheaper than paying a junior dev? Let’s talk real costs, world averages and hidden pitfalls.

And yeah, all these costs can flip in a year or so, but as of August 2025, here’s the true lowdown.

Junior Developer Hourly Salary (Global Snap, 2025)

#

LLM Coding Cost in Real Life

#

• Cost per prompt: High-context prompt (Claude/03/enterprise-style) can easily hit $1.47 per 3-minute run.
• Monthly AI sub: Cursor, Copilot, Tabnine: $20–$50/month for “normal” use, with overages for heavy prompting.
• Serious AI power users: $20–$60/month just in extras if they’re “vibe coding” all session.
• Token bloat: LLMs will chew through tokens for whole files, repos, or even unnecessary context (which ramps up cost).
• If you keep hitting “regenerate” stuck on a bug? You can match your hourly pay in AI costs, easy.

The Math

#

If you pay $1.47 per 3-minute prompt and keep this up:

• 60 / 3 = 20 prompts/hr
• 20 × $1.47 = $29.40/hr

That’s already close to a US junior dev’s hourly wage, and you haven’t written a line yourself.

Vibe Coding LLM Token Cost Spiral

#

graph TD
    Start(Coding)
    Prompt1(Prompt LLM: $1.47)
    Issue(Still Stuck)
    Prompt2(More Prompts: +$1.47)
    Loop{Resolved?}
    Done(Fixed!)
    Cashburn(Oops, Cost Stack!)

    Start --> Prompt1 --> Issue --> Prompt2
    Prompt2 --> Loop
    Loop -- No --> Issue
    Loop -- Yes --> Done
    Issue --> Cashburn
    Cashburn --> Done

When LLM Slurps Too Much Context (Files = Token Bloat)

#

flowchart LR
    A[User Prompt] --> B{Context Selection}
    B -- "Just What’s Needed" --> C[Reasonable Token Use]
    B -- "Whole Files/Repo" --> D[Massive Token Count]
    D --> E[High Extra AI Cost]
    C --> F[Low Cost]
    E --> G[Overage Fees or Slowed Workflow]
    F --> H[Efficient Dev]

LLM vs Junior Dev Global Cost Ranges

#

flowchart TB
    US[US Junior: $43/hr]
    USLLM[US LLM: $29/hr]
    EU[W.Europe Junior: $40/hr]
    EULLM[W.Europe LLM: $29/hr]
    APAC[Asia Dev: $16-$30/hr]
    APACLLM[Asia LLM: $14-$30/hr]
    US --> USLLM
    EU --> EULLM
    APAC --> APACLLM

The Real Gotchas

#

• LLMs will munch tokens on files you don’t even need. The more context you dump (accidentally or out of frustration), the quicker your cost climbs.
• AI assistants often let you go into “death spirals.” Stuck? You might keep burning cash with each new, ineffective prompt.
• Companies pay, but they watch the burn. Most places cap use, even with “unlimited” packages, or simply won’t let your LLM spend match your billable salary.
• Better prompts = less waste. The savvier you get, the cheaper your average “block” costs.

Will LLM Costs Crash Next Year?

#

Tough one to call. As of August 2025, GPUs are a bit cheaper, but every new premium AI release raises pricing too. And most dev tool companies are subsidizing hard, running loss-leader plans to win market share—this will change. Don’t expect free or underpriced LLMs forever.

TL;DR – Don’t Get Vibe-Blind

#

• You can burn your whole hourly rate in prompts if you’re not careful.
• The global gap is shrinking: AI cost and dev cost are not that far apart, especially for basic features and debugging.
• Don’t dump giant useless files: More context = less profit.
• Smart prompting and better context mean lower costs.
• Could flip next year as hardware, pricing, and AI quality change—track your costs!

“The download is free. The cost is operational.”

Don’t forget: The real pro move is knowing when to let the AI assist, and when to just dig in solo. Here’s to keeping costs low, code clean, and spirits high.

(All cost data current as of August 2025. If reading in the future, check for updates!)